Search for: All records

We present MeerKAT H Iobservations of ESO 137-001, a quintessential jellyfish galaxy with long multi-phase tails formed due to the interaction with the intra-cluster medium of its host galaxy cluster, ACO 3627. Our observations reveal the presence of H Iin both the disc and outer regions of the galaxy for the first time, with a total H Imass of (3.5 ± 0.4)×10⁸M_⊙. ESO 137-001 is at an advanced stage of gas stripping; it is extremely H Ideficient and seems to have lost 90% of its initial H Imass; about 2/3 of the surviving H Iis found at larger radius than expected for a normal H Idisc and forms ∼40 kpc tail coincident with the tail detected at other wavelengths. Only ∼10% of the surviving H Iis still found within the stellar disc, consistent with the expectation of an outside-in truncation due to ram pressure. Similarly to other jellyfish galaxies, ESO137-001 has a high star formation rate for the low amount of H Idetected. We measure an H Idepletion time of 0.29 Gyr. However, when taking into account the total gas (H I+ H₂) content, the depletion time is consistent with typical values measured in nearby spiral galaxies. This suggests that ESO 137-001 is at its current stage of ram pressure interaction characterised by an efficient H Istripping, rather than an enhanced conversion of H Ito H₂, which was recently observed in some other jellyfish galaxies. 

ABSTRACT The 21 cm transition from neutral hydrogen promises to be the best observational probe of the epoch of reionization (EoR). The main difficulty in measuring the 21 cm signal is the presence of bright foregrounds that require very accurate interferometric calibration. Closure quantities may circumvent the calibration requirements but may be, however, affected by direction-dependent effects, particularly antenna primary beam responses. This work investigates the impact of antenna primary beams affected by mutual coupling on the closure phase and its power spectrum. Our simulations show that primary beams affected by mutual coupling lead to a leakage of foreground power into the EoR window, which can be up to ∼104 times higher than the case where no mutual coupling is considered. This leakage is, however, essentially confined at k < 0.3 h Mpc−1 for triads that include 29 m baselines. The leakage magnitude is more pronounced when bright foregrounds appear in the antenna sidelobes, as expected. Finally, we find that triads that include mutual coupling beams different from each other have power spectra similar to triads that include the same type of mutual coupling beam, indicating that beam-to-beam variation within triads (or visibility pairs) is not the major source of foreground leakage in the EoR window.